{"product_id":"committed-the-battle-over-involuntary-psychiatric-care-paperback","title":"Committed: The Battle Over Involuntary Psychiatric Care - Paperback","description":"\u003cp\u003eby \u003cb\u003eDinah Miller\u003c\/b\u003e (Author), \u003cb\u003eAnnette Hanson\u003c\/b\u003e (Author), \u003cb\u003ePete Earley\u003c\/b\u003e (Foreword by)\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eBattle lines have been drawn over involuntary treatment. On one side are those who oppose involuntary psychiatric treatments under any condition. Activists who take up this cause often don't acknowledge that psychiatric symptoms can render people dangerous to themselves or others, regardless of their civil rights. On the other side are groups pushing for increased use of involuntary treatment. These proponents are quick to point out that people with psychiatric illnesses often don't recognize that they are ill, which (from their perspective) makes the discussion of civil rights moot. They may gloss over the sometimes dangerous side effects of psychiatric medications, and they often don't admit that patients, even after their symptoms have abated, are sometimes unhappy that treatment was inflicted upon them.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn \u003cem\u003eCommitted\u003c\/em\u003e, psychiatrists Dinah Miller and Annette Hanson offer a thought-provoking and engaging account of the controversy surrounding involuntary psychiatric care in the United States. They bring the issue to life with first-hand accounts from patients, clinicians, advocates, and opponents. Looking at practices such as seclusion and restraint, involuntary medication, and involuntary electroconvulsive therapy--all within the context of civil rights--Miller and Hanson illuminate the personal consequences of these controversial practices through voices of people who have been helped by the treatment they had as well as those who have been traumatized by it.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe authors explore the question of whether involuntary treatment has a role in preventing violence, suicide, and mass murder. They delve into the controversial use of court-ordered outpatient treatment at its best and at its worst. Finally, they examine innovative solutions--mental health court, crisis intervention training, and pretrial diversion--that are intended to expand access to care while diverting people who have serious mental illness out of the cycle of repeated hospitalization and incarceration. They also assess what psychiatry knows about the prediction of violence and the limitations of laws designed to protect the public.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003ch3\u003eFront Jacket\u003c\/h3\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eBattle lines have been drawn over involuntary treatment. On one side are those who oppose involuntary psychiatric treatments under any condition. Activists who take up this cause often don't acknowledge that psychiatric symptoms can render people dangerous to themselves or others, regardless of their civil rights. On the other side are groups pushing for increased use of involuntary treatment. These proponents are quick to point out that people with psychiatric illnesses often don't recognize that they are ill, which (from their perspective) makes the discussion of civil rights moot. They may gloss over the sometimes dangerous side effects of psychiatric medications, and they often don't admit that patients, even after their symptoms have abated, are sometimes unhappy that treatment was inflicted upon them.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn \u003ci\u003eCommitted\u003c\/i\u003e, psychiatrists Dinah Miller and Annette Hanson offer a thought-provoking and engaging account of the controversy surrounding involuntary psychiatric care in the United States. They bring the issue to life with first-hand accounts from patients, clinicians, advocates, and opponents. Looking at practices such as seclusion and restraint, involuntary medication, and involuntary electroconvulsive therapy--all within the context of civil rights--Miller and Hanson illuminate the personal consequences of these controversial practices through voices of people who have been helped by the treatment they had as well as those who have been traumatized by it.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe authors explore the question of whether involuntary treatment has a role in preventing violence, suicide, and mass murder. They delve into the controversial use of court-ordered outpatient treatment at its best and at its worst. Finally, they examine innovative solutions--mental health court, crisis intervention training, and pretrial diversion--that are intended to expand access to care while diverting people who have serious mental illness out of the cycle of repeated hospitalization and incarceration. They also assess what psychiatry knows about the prediction of violence and the limitations of laws designed to protect the public.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eA highly informative and surprisingly balanced book that should be read by anyone with a personal or professional stake in how the mental health system provides care to those with chronic severe illnesses and those in acute crisis . . . Although \u003ci\u003eCommitted\u003c\/i\u003e explores a complex subject, Miller and Hanson make a great effort to humanize this discussion.--\u003ci\u003eWashington Post\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eExceptionally intelligent, clear, readable and well researched.--\u003ci\u003ePsychology Today\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis fact-filled, open-minded, and straightforward survey will interest students of the subject and those serving mentally ill clients.--\u003ci\u003eLibrary Journal\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eCommitted is a very informative and thought-provoking book . . . Highly recommended. All readers.--\u003ci\u003eChoice\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eA compelling, exceptionally well-researched and written analysis of the immensely complicated, multifaceted issues faced by families, physicians, psychiatrists, police, the courts and society when mental illness endangers patients and those around them.--J\u003ci\u003eohns Hopkins Medicine\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIt is refreshing--indeed therapeutic--to encounter a thoughtful, balanced treatment of this contentious and important topic.--Psychiatric Times\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis is quite a feat in 265 readable pages. I applaud the authors for their work.--Mad In America\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eI would recommend [Committed] to every clinician.--PsycCRITIQUE\u003c\/p\u003e--Dominic A. Sisti, director, Scattergood Program for Applied Ethics of Behavioral Health Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania \"PsycCRITIQUES\"\u003ch3\u003eBack Jacket\u003c\/h3\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eBattle lines have been drawn over involuntary treatment. On one side are those who oppose involuntary psychiatric treatments under any condition. Activists who take up this cause often don't acknowledge that psychiatric symptoms can render people dangerous to themselves or others, regardless of their civil rights. On the other side are groups pushing for increased use of involuntary treatment. These proponents are quick to point out that people with psychiatric illnesses often don't recognize that they are ill, which (from their perspective) makes the discussion of civil rights moot. They may gloss over the sometimes dangerous side effects of psychiatric medications, and they often don't admit that patients, even after their symptoms have abated, are sometimes unhappy that treatment was inflicted upon them.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn \u003ci\u003eCommitted\u003c\/i\u003e, psychiatrists Dinah Miller and Annette Hanson offer a thought-provoking and engaging account of the controversy surrounding involuntary psychiatric care in the United States. They bring the issue to life with first-hand accounts from patients, clinicians, advocates, and opponents. Looking at practices such as seclusion and restraint, involuntary medication, and involuntary electroconvulsive therapy--all within the context of civil rights--Miller and Hanson illuminate the personal consequences of these controversial practices through voices of people who have been helped by the treatment they had as well as those who have been traumatized by it.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe authors explore the question of whether involuntary treatment has a role in preventing violence, suicide, and mass murder. They delve into the controversial use of court-ordered outpatient treatment at its best and at its worst. Finally, they examine innovative solutions--mental health court, crisis intervention training, and pretrial diversion--that are intended to expand access to care while diverting people who have serious mental illness out of the cycle of repeated hospitalization and incarceration. They also assess what psychiatry knows about the prediction of violence and the limitations of laws designed to protect the public.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\"A highly informative and surprisingly balanced book that should be read by anyone with a personal or professional stake in how the mental health system provides care to those with chronic severe illnesses and those in acute crisis . . . Although \u003ci\u003eCommitted\u003c\/i\u003e explores a complex subject, Miller and Hanson make a great effort to humanize this discussion.\"--\u003ci\u003eWashington Post\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\"Exceptionally intelligent, clear, readable and well researched.\"--\u003ci\u003ePsychology Today\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\"This fact-filled, open-minded, and straightforward survey will interest students of the subject and those serving mentally ill clients.\"--\u003ci\u003eLibrary Journal\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\"Committed is a very informative and thought-provoking book . . . Highly recommended. All readers.\"--\u003ci\u003eChoice\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\"A compelling, exceptionally well-researched and written analysis of the immensely complicated, multifaceted issues faced by families, physicians, psychiatrists, police, the courts and society when mental illness endangers patients and those around them.\"--J\u003ci\u003eohns Hopkins Medicine\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\"It is refreshing--indeed therapeutic--to encounter a thoughtful, balanced treatment of this contentious and important topic.\"--Psychiatric Times\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\"This is quite a feat in 265 readable pages. I applaud the authors for their work.\"--Mad In America\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\"I would recommend [Committed] to every clinician.\"--PsycCRITIQUE\u003c\/p\u003e\u003ch3\u003eAuthor Biography\u003c\/h3\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eDinah Miller, MD, \u003c\/b\u003eis a psychiatrist in Baltimore, where she is an assistant professor of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. \u003cb\u003eAnnette Hanson, MD, \u003c\/b\u003e is an assistant professor of psychiatry at the University of Maryland School of Medicine and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Drs. Miller and Hanson are coauthors of \u003ci\u003eShrink Rap: Three Psychiatrists Discuss Their Work\u003c\/i\u003e.\u003c\/p\u003e\n            \u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eNumber of Pages:\u003c\/strong\u003e 328\u003c\/div\u003e\n            \u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eDimensions:\u003c\/strong\u003e 0.9 x 8.9 x 5.9 IN\u003c\/div\u003e\n            \u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003ePublication Date:\u003c\/strong\u003e February 28, 2018\u003c\/div\u003e\n            ","brand":"BooksCloud","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":67972554031411,"sku":"9781421425412","price":51.37,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0300\/5595\/6612\/files\/UDyhL9YBHo9781421425412.webp?v=1794430378","url":"https:\/\/www.vysn.com\/products\/committed-the-battle-over-involuntary-psychiatric-care-paperback","provider":"VYSN","version":"1.0","type":"link"}