{"product_id":"shaping-science-with-rhetoric-the-cases-of-dobzhansky-schrodinger-and-wilson-paperback","title":"Shaping Science with Rhetoric: The Cases of Dobzhansky, Schrodinger, and Wilson - Paperback","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\u003cp style=\"text-align: right;\"\u003e\u003ca href=\"https:\/\/reportcopyrightinfringement.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003e\u003cb\u003eReport copyright infringement\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/a\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003c\/div\u003e\u003cp\u003eby \u003cb\u003eLeah Ceccarelli\u003c\/b\u003e (Author)\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHow do scientists persuade colleagues from diverse fields to cross the disciplinary divide, risking their careers in new interdisciplinary research programs? Why do some attempts to inspire such research win widespread acclaim and support, while others do not? \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e In \u003ci\u003eShaping Science with Rhetoric, \u003c\/i\u003e Leah Ceccarelli addresses such questions through close readings of three scientific monographs in their historical contexts-Theodosius Dobzhansky's \u003ci\u003eGenetics and the Origin of Species\u003c\/i\u003e (1937), which inspired the \"modern synthesis\" of evolutionary biology; Erwin Schrödinger's \u003ci\u003eWhat Is Life?\u003c\/i\u003e (1944), which catalyzed the field of molecular biology; and Edward O. Wilson's \u003ci\u003eConsilience\u003c\/i\u003e (1998), a so far not entirely successful attempt to unite the social and biological sciences. She examines the rhetorical strategies used in each book and evaluates which worked best, based on the reviews and scientific papers that followed in their wake. \u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e Ceccarelli's work will be important for anyone interested in how interdisciplinary fields are formed, from historians and rhetoricians of science to scientists themselves.\u003ch3\u003eFront Jacket\u003c\/h3\u003e\u003cp\u003eHow do scientists persuade colleagues from diverse fields to cross the disciplinary divide, risking their careers in new interdisciplinary research programs? Why do some attempts to inspire such research win widespread acclaim and support, while others do not? \u003cbr\u003eIn \"Shaping Science with Rhetoric, \" Leah Ceccarelli addresses such questions through close readings of three scientific monographs in their historical contexts Theodosius Dobzhansky's \"Genetics and the Origin of Species\" (1937), which inspired the \"modern synthesis\" of evolutionary biology; Erwin Schrodinger's \"What Is Life?\" (1944), which catalyzed the field of molecular biology; and Edward O. Wilson's \"Consilience\" (1998), a so far not entirely successful attempt to unite the social and biological sciences. She examines the rhetorical strategies used in each book and evaluates which worked best, based on the reviews and scientific papers that followed in their wake. \u003cbr\u003eCeccarelli's work will be important for anyone interested in how interdisciplinary fields are formed, from historians and rhetoricians of science to scientists themselves.\"\u003c\/p\u003e\u003ch3\u003eBack Jacket\u003c\/h3\u003e\u003cp\u003eHow do scientists persuade colleagues from diverse fields to cross the disciplinary divide, risking their careers in new interdisciplinary research programs? Why do some attempts to inspire such research win widespread acclaim and support, while others do not? \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003eIn \u003ci\u003eShaping Science with Rhetoric, \u003c\/i\u003e Leah Ceccarelli addresses such questions through close readings of three scientific monographs in their historical contexts--Theodosius Dobzhansky's \u003ci\u003eGenetics and the Origin of Species\u003c\/i\u003e (1937), which inspired the \"modern synthesis\" of evolutionary biology; Erwin Schrödinger's \u003ci\u003eWhat Is Life?\u003c\/i\u003e (1944), which catalyzed the field of molecular biology; and Edward O. Wilson's \u003ci\u003eConsilience\u003c\/i\u003e (1998), a so far not entirely successful attempt to unite the social and biological sciences. She examines the rhetorical strategies used in each book and evaluates which worked best, based on the reviews and scientific papers that followed in their wake. \u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003eCeccarelli's work will be important for anyone interested in how interdisciplinary fields are formed, from historians and rhetoricians of science to scientists themselves.\u003ch3\u003eAuthor Biography\u003c\/h3\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eLeah Ceccarelli\u003c\/b\u003e is an assistant professor in the Department of Speech Communication at the University of Washington, Seattle.\u003c\/p\u003e\n            \u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eNumber of Pages:\u003c\/strong\u003e 192\u003c\/div\u003e\n            \u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eDimensions:\u003c\/strong\u003e 0.53 x 9.02 x 6.02 IN\u003c\/div\u003e\n            \u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eIllustrated:\u003c\/strong\u003e Yes\u003c\/div\u003e\n            \u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003ePublication Date:\u003c\/strong\u003e July 01, 2001\u003c\/div\u003e\n            ","brand":"BooksCloud","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":52696950571315,"sku":"9780226099071","price":73.6,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0300\/5595\/6612\/files\/Jg4VFd5anL9780226099071.webp?v=1763124861","url":"https:\/\/www.vysn.com\/en-ca\/products\/shaping-science-with-rhetoric-the-cases-of-dobzhansky-schrodinger-and-wilson-paperback","provider":"VYSN","version":"1.0","type":"link"}